|
|
RR alfalfa (glyphosate resistance)
This is very expensive alfalfa seed. I think they overestimated what the market will bear and acreage that needs herbicide treatment. When weeds invade an established stand, it usually means poor management and/or the stand is declining and needs to be taken out. Applying a glyphosate herbicide may increase quality, but decreases yield. The only advantage that I see for RR alfalfa is 1st cut seedling year weed control. A companion cereal crop for weed, erosion and leafhopper control can best be removed with a grass herbicide. An herbicide such as Raptor will cause crop injury, but there are other herbicides or the entire field may not have to be treated. There may be a few instances where glyphosate alfalfa may work for some particular weed problem. However when considering the over use of glyphosate and the developing glyphosate resistant weeds, that the perennial mature of alfalfa making good stewardship practice difficult, the seed size similar to many weeds resulting in potential spread of resistant weeds, the introduction of RR alfalfa does not seem like a good idea. It seems to me that the introduction of glyphosate resistance into alfalfa will hasten the development of resistant weeds destroying the value of this effective inexpensive herbicide. In addition; you lose glyphosate as a means of taking out the stand. If you are considering RR varieties, check for yield against regular varieties. It is surprising they released and produced considerable seed when the only independent data is seedling year data. You may be paying a lot for weed control in the first cutting with lower hay yields for the rest of the life of the stand. You can find some yield data at the following sites.
http://plbrgen.cals.cornell.edu/programsandprojects/departmental/foragetest; Table 1: Alfalfa trial at Ithaca, Tompkins Co., Sown April 29, 2003 Table 2: Alfalfa Trial at Chazy, Clinton Co., Sown May 13, 2004 http://varietytest.unl.edu/alfalfa/2006/HAVELOCK2006table06.htm Havelock, Lancaster County, Agronomy Research Farm http://www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu/plantsci/forage/perftest.htm Table 4) Marshfield Wood County http://plantsci.sdstate.edu/forages/Alfalfa%20Trials/SD_Alfalfa_Trials.html Brookings, SD http://www.css.msu.edu/VarietyTrials/Index.html East Lansing, Ingham Co. http://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/forage2006/ Wooster, Ohio http://alfalfa.okstate.edu/var-test/2006/501-2006.htm Stillwater, Agronomy Research Station, Payne Count Chickasha, Central Oklahoma Research Station, Grady Count Perkins, Agronomy Research Station, Payne County http://www.croptesting.iastate.edu/alfalfa/results/ Nashua, Floyd County, Northeast research farm http://www.idahohay.com/06alftrials.pdf Rexburg, Idaho http://www.minnesotafarmguide.com/articles/2007/03/05/seed_guide/alfalfa/sg12.txt Rosemount, MN This is a study on forage yield in Idaho funded by FGI and Monsanto. www.idahohay.com/Shewmaker.pdf This is a pollen drift study funded by FGI and Monsanto http://www.colostate.edu/Depts/CoopExt/TRA/Agronomy/Alfalfa/Hammon.RRpollenflow.pdf |